Author Topic: The Starship "I risk sending a thread off topic" Homeless Posts Thread 2  (Read 389465 times)

Offline catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17527
  • Enthusiast since the Redstone and Thunderbirds
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 15410
  • Likes Given: 11010
It's Tony De La Rosa, ...I don't create this stuff, I just report it.

Offline catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17527
  • Enthusiast since the Redstone and Thunderbirds
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 15410
  • Likes Given: 11010
It's Tony De La Rosa, ...I don't create this stuff, I just report it.

Offline catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17527
  • Enthusiast since the Redstone and Thunderbirds
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 15410
  • Likes Given: 11010
Giving Interstellar Gateway a shout out for reaching 10K subscribers.  Here is a short thank you video.



Quote
Apr 20, 2025
Interstellar Gateway has surpassed the next YouTube milestone, 10K subs! To celebrate, we put this video together! There have been a lot of successes, some failures, and a ton of learning along the way, but we are excited to continue to grow as a team and to keep providing our audience with the best views in spaceflight!
It's Tony De La Rosa, ...I don't create this stuff, I just report it.

Offline Johnnyhinbos

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3867
  • Boston, MA
  • Liked: 8097
  • Likes Given: 950
Watching SpaceX take dowwn the wall at the production site last night reminded me of when I recorded the pulling down of a building down the street from my home. Interesting note: My video caused the developer and the demo contractor to get called into the mayor's office...  :D




John Hanzl. Author, action / adventure www.johnhanzl.com

Offline jstrotha0975

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 735
  • United States
  • Liked: 421
  • Likes Given: 3491
More like a statement than a question, I can't help but feel that the Starship program would be at the same place it is now if SpaceX took the long way of doing things like old space and tried to make everything work on the first launch.

Offline Twark_Main

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4671
  • Technically we ALL live in space
  • Liked: 2490
  • Likes Given: 1444
Watching SpaceX take dowwn the wall at the production site last night reminded me of when I recorded the pulling down of a building down the street from my home. Interesting note: My video caused the developer and the demo contractor to get called into the mayor's office...  :D


---


Not even amateurs.  These are Ham-ateurs.

I can see why they were brought in for questioning!  Cheap way to get views, but hey it worked on me.  ;)
« Last Edit: 05/02/2025 11:42 pm by Twark_Main »

Offline sdsds

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8126
  • “With peace and hope for all mankind.”
  • Seattle
  • Liked: 2791
  • Likes Given: 2515
SN15 - May 5, 2021
— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 —

Offline Cabbage123

  • Member
  • Posts: 88
  • London
  • Liked: 94
  • Likes Given: 12
More like a statement than a question, I can't help but feel that the Starship program would be at the same place it is now if SpaceX took the long way of doing things like old space and tried to make everything work on the first launch.

Before asking whether it could have been done at the same speed, we would need to ask whether it could be done at all.

A lot of early rocket development was done in a rapid iterative manner, while core technologies were being developed, and then things slowed down to "work first time" once a lot of that early work was done.

Could the innovations and capabilities of Starship have been achieved using the "work first time" approach, rather than a return to the early days of rapid iteration? Probably not.
« Last Edit: 05/09/2025 07:53 pm by Cabbage123 »

Offline spacenut

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5515
  • East Alabama
  • Liked: 2750
  • Likes Given: 3278
Side question.  Haven't seen it.  Are they building a second Starship launch tower at pad 39A? 

Offline Tomness

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 720
  • Into the abyss will I run
  • Liked: 326
  • Likes Given: 764
Side question.  Haven't seen it.  Are they building a second Starship launch tower at pad 39A?

They have to, the way they catch now is the only way they could do a refuling tanker run as well. They haven't shown any ability to recycle a pad and try to refuel yet.

Offline notthebobo

  • Member
  • Posts: 23
  • Liked: 26
  • Likes Given: 124
An interesting thought experiment from John Carmack has me thinking about what may come out of a Mars society that is beneficial to earth. One might be optimization techniques for older technology to extend its life since they will not be able to produce their own technology for some time, and reusing older technology will make sense.

Offline punder

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1347
  • Liked: 1996
  • Likes Given: 1576
Martian cybersteampunk. Awesome!

Offline Vultur

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2453
  • Liked: 1047
  • Likes Given: 184
I think that *if* Mars becomes a real society (more than an ISS style, or even Antarctica style, "outpost/base" but more like a town or city built in remote areas on Earth before modern super-rapid travel, e.g. 19th century Salt Lake City) there will be a lot of spinoffs for Earth, technological and maybe societal too.

 I think the mere existence of this kind of "modern frontier" will make a surprisingly big difference, for one thing.

Also, a Mars effort on this scale won't exist by itself. The Starship launch rate implied would mean really cheap launch costs, which would make all kinds of things practical to do in space that aren't practical today.  Especially since Mars travel is synod based, there will be a lot of "spare capacity" at other times of the synodal cycle. In a world where this exists, it's hard to see there *not* being private space stations of some sort, likely space manufacturing, maybe even space solar power

I also think a society on Mars in the "intermediate stage" when it's more than just a base but most of the adult population is still Earth-born would be very different from any society that's ever existed on Earth, since it would be really strongly self-selected in ways I really can't think of a historical analogue to. Eventually there'd be "regression to the mean" as the Mars-born generations grew up and came to make up more and more of the population, but depending on the rate of population movement from Earth to Mars vs Martian birthrate, that state might last a really long time. It's hard to know what kind of spinoffs could arise from a fundamentally different society.
« Last Edit: 05/13/2025 07:34 pm by Vultur »

Offline Slarty1080

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2843
  • UK
  • Liked: 1913
  • Likes Given: 838
I think that *if* Mars becomes a real society (more than an ISS style, or even Antarctica style, "outpost/base" but more like a town or city built in remote areas on Earth before modern super-rapid travel, e.g. 19th century Salt Lake City) there will be a lot of spinoffs for Earth, technological and maybe societal too.

 I think the mere existence of this kind of "modern frontier" will make a surprisingly big difference, for one thing.

Also, a Mars effort on this scale won't exist by itself. The Starship launch rate implied would mean really cheap launch costs, which would make all kinds of things practical to do in space that aren't practical today.  Especially since Mars travel is synod based, there will be a lot of "spare capacity" at other times of the synodal cycle. In a world where this exists, it's hard to see there *not* being private space stations of some sort, likely space manufacturing, maybe even space solar power

I also think a society on Mars in the "intermediate stage" when it's more than just a base but most of the adult population is still Earth-born would be very different from any society that's ever existed on Earth, since it would be really strongly self-selected in ways I really can't think of a historical analogue to. Eventually there'd be "regression to the mean" as the Mars-born generations grew up and came to make up more and more of the population, but depending on the rate of population movement from Earth to Mars vs Martian birthrate, that state might last a really long time. It's hard to know what kind of spinoffs could arise from a fundamentally different society.
The spinoffs from any Mars base have tremendous potential, but I suspect that everyone there will be Earth born for a very long time. We don't know if gestation and birth would be safe on Mars (currently an open question). It's safe in 1g, but I doubt very much it is safe in 0g and as for 0.34g who knows. At the very least it's going to take a long time to find out given the multiple ethical issues involved and the likely backlash if anything goes wrong.
My optimistic hope is that it will become cool to really think about things... rather than just doing reactive bullsh*t based on no knowledge (Brian Cox)

Offline Vultur

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2453
  • Liked: 1047
  • Likes Given: 184
I think if people go intending to settle rather than just explore/do science, it will be found out fairly quickly, honestly. Having children in the new area is kind of a core part of settlement.

But yeah Earth born people would remain the vast majority for a very long time. I do think there'd be some "regression to the mean" anyway though as populations increased and emigrating to Mars became less exceptional.
« Last Edit: 05/17/2025 08:23 pm by Vultur »

Offline Slarty1080

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2843
  • UK
  • Liked: 1913
  • Likes Given: 838
I think if people go intending to settle rather than just explore/do science, it will be found out fairly quickly, honestly. Having children in the new area is kind of a core part of settlement.

But yeah Earth born people would remain the vast majority for a very long time. I do think there'd be some "regression to the mean" anyway though as populations increased and emigrating to Mars became less exceptional.

Maybe you are right and I hope it works out well. But I wouldn't want to have to deal with a child on Mars with some skeletal problem or other handicap.
My optimistic hope is that it will become cool to really think about things... rather than just doing reactive bullsh*t based on no knowledge (Brian Cox)

Offline Vultur

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2453
  • Liked: 1047
  • Likes Given: 184
I think if people go intending to settle rather than just explore/do science, it will be found out fairly quickly, honestly. Having children in the new area is kind of a core part of settlement.

But yeah Earth born people would remain the vast majority for a very long time. I do think there'd be some "regression to the mean" anyway though as populations increased and emigrating to Mars became less exceptional.

Maybe you are right and I hope it works out well. But I wouldn't want to have to deal with a child on Mars with some skeletal problem or other handicap.

I'm not saying it'll be terribly safe.  And Mars settlement isn't guaranteed to work - even if Starship sends people there successfully, it could end up like current Antarctic scientific outposts.

But what I don't see as plausible is a significant number of people going with the intention to settle permanently, and still no kids being born there for decades and decades.

(I personally think it will be basically fine*, that biologically Mars gravity will be vastly more like Earth gravity than zero g. But I can't *prove* that to anyone's satisfaction.

*more accurately, that there will likely be some increased development risk relative to 'ideal' conditions, but not risk out of scope to common non-ideal but generally considered 'normal' conditions for pregnancy on Earth. )
« Last Edit: 05/17/2025 10:40 pm by Vultur »

Offline rsdavis9

I think if people go intending to settle rather than just explore/do science, it will be found out fairly quickly, honestly. Having children in the new area is kind of a core part of settlement.

But yeah Earth born people would remain the vast majority for a very long time. I do think there'd be some "regression to the mean" anyway though as populations increased and emigrating to Mars became less exceptional.

Maybe you are right and I hope it works out well. But I wouldn't want to have to deal with a child on Mars with some skeletal problem or other handicap.

I'm not saying it'll be terribly safe.  And Mars settlement isn't guaranteed to work - even if Starship sends people there successfully, it could end up like current Antarctic scientific outposts.

But what I don't see as plausible is a significant number of people going with the intention to settle permanently, and still no kids being born there for decades and decades.

(I personally think it will be basically fine*, that biologically Mars gravity will be vastly more like Earth gravity than zero g. But I can't *prove* that to anyone's satisfaction.

*more accurately, that there will likely be some increased development risk relative to 'ideal' conditions, but not risk out of scope to common non-ideal but generally considered 'normal' conditions for pregnancy on Earth. )

And having a space station in orbit around mars with rotating 1g could help with kids living there for a percentage of time to help development.

With ELV best efficiency was the paradigm. The new paradigm is reusable, good enough, and commonality of design.
Same engines. Design once. Same vehicle. Design once. Reusable. Build once.

Offline spacenut

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5515
  • East Alabama
  • Liked: 2750
  • Likes Given: 3278
Yeah, a Babylon 5 type station around Mars for raising kids.  Workers could travel between Mars and the station.  Same thing could be built at LL1 for lunar work.  Mining, manufacturing, growing food, etc, on Mars while their families live and grow up on the 1g station.  Kind of like a military family.  One will be on a tour of duty on the Martian surface while the other parent stays with the kids on the station. 

Offline BN

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 222
  • Earth
  • Liked: 102
  • Likes Given: 21


I think that *if* Mars becomes a real society (more than an ISS style, or even Antarctica style, "outpost/base" but more like a town or city built in remote areas on Earth before modern super-rapid travel, e.g. 19th century Salt Lake City) there will be a lot of spinoffs for Earth, technological and maybe societal too.

 I think the mere existence of this kind of "modern frontier" will make a surprisingly big difference, for one thing.

Also, a Mars effort on this scale won't exist by itself. The Starship launch rate implied would mean really cheap launch costs, which would make all kinds of things practical to do in space that aren't practical today.  Especially since Mars travel is synod based, there will be a lot of "spare capacity" at other times of the synodal cycle. In a world where this exists, it's hard to see there *not* being private space stations of some sort, likely space manufacturing, maybe even space solar power

I also think a society on Mars in the "intermediate stage" when it's more than just a base but most of the adult population is still Earth-born would be very different from any society that's ever existed on Earth, since it would be really strongly self-selected in ways I really can't think of a historical analogue to. Eventually there'd be "regression to the mean" as the Mars-born generations grew up and came to make up more and more of the population, but depending on the rate of population movement from Earth to Mars vs Martian birthrate, that state might last a really long time. It's hard to know what kind of spinoffs could arise from a fundamentally different society.
The spinoffs from any Mars base have tremendous potential, but I suspect that everyone there will be Earth born for a very long time. We don't know if gestation and birth would be safe on Mars (currently an open question). It's safe in 1g, but I doubt very much it is safe in 0g and as for 0.34g who knows. At the very least it's going to take a long time to find out given the multiple ethical issues involved and the likely backlash if anything goes wrong.

we know for sure that 0g is not viable for embryogenesis.

development in 0.34g seems quite likely to result in deformities.





I think if people go intending to settle rather than just explore/do science, it will be found out fairly quickly, honestly. Having children in the new area is kind of a core part of settlement.

But yeah Earth born people would remain the vast majority for a very long time. I do think there'd be some "regression to the mean" anyway though as populations increased and emigrating to Mars became less exceptional.

Maybe you are right and I hope it works out well. But I wouldn't want to have to deal with a child on Mars with some skeletal problem or other handicap.

I'm not saying it'll be terribly safe.  And Mars settlement isn't guaranteed to work - even if Starship sends people there successfully, it could end up like current Antarctic scientific outposts.

But what I don't see as plausible is a significant number of people going with the intention to settle permanently, and still no kids being born there for decades and decades.

(I personally think it will be basically fine*, that biologically Mars gravity will be vastly more like Earth gravity than zero g. But I can't *prove* that to anyone's satisfaction.

*more accurately, that there will likely be some increased development risk relative to 'ideal' conditions, but not risk out of scope to common non-ideal but generally considered 'normal' conditions for pregnancy on Earth. )





« Last Edit: 05/18/2025 01:12 pm by BN »

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1
OSZAR »